Grand Canyon

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

56.7%Grand Canyon

43.3%UNLV

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL153.1

MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -131

UNLV

18-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 77

Projected Total153.1

Projected ScoreUNLV 76

Team Comparison

Grand CanyonMetricUNLV

59.8MMH Power Index52.8

109.2Offensive Efficiency111.0

99.1Defensive Efficiency109.6

10.1Net Efficiency1.4

2.0Strength of Schedule2.7

9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1

69.3Tempo71.4

52.1%Effective FG%53.7%

17.6%Turnover Rate17.2%

31.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

41.0%Free Throw Rate41.6%

7.0Average Margin1.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–52.8), defensive efficiency (99.1–109.6), net efficiency (10.1–1.4), recent form (9.7–1.1).

UNLV COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.0–109.2), strength of schedule (2.7–2.0), shooting efficiency (53.7–52.1).

Final

Grand Canyon

78—80

UNLV

UNLV by 2 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Grand CanyonTEAM STATUNLV

22-57FG27-63

39.0%FG%43.0%

8-243PT8-24

33.0%3PT%33.0%

26-35FT18-19

74.0%FT%95.0%

36Rebounds41

12Offensive Rebounds13

11Assists15

11Turnovers12

6Steals5

3Blocks6

19Fouls27

Player Box Score

Grand Canyon

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nana Owusu-Anane	F	38	6-9	3-4	4-5	13	3	4	0	19
Jaden Henley	G	36	5-16	0-5	7-9	10	2	1	2	17
Makaih Williams	G	29	4-10	3-6	5-8	1	1	0	0	16
Efe Demirel	C	21	2-4	0-0	6-6	6	0	0	1	10
Dusty Stromer	G	23	2-7	2-5	2-4	1	0	0	0	8
Brian Moore Jr.	G	35	2-7	0-2	2-3	1	5	0	0	6
Wilhelm Breidenbach	F	13	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Dennis Evans	C	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UNLV

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn	G	40	10-23	3-8	6-6	2	2	1	1	29
Al Green	G	21	4-6	1-3	4-4	2	1	0	0	13
Issac Williamson	G	24	2-6	2-5	4-5	1	1	1	1	10
Kimani Hamilton	F	19	5-9	0-2	0-0	5	1	1	1	10
Walter Brown	F	24	2-5	2-3	2-2	6	1	1	0	8
Jacob Bannarbie	F	29	2-4	0-0	1-1	15	5	0	1	5
Naas Cunningham	F	27	1-6	0-3	1-1	2	3	1	0	3
Emmanuel Stephen	C	11	1-4	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	1	2
Jalen Cunningham	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8

108.6Offensive Efficiency111.4

111.4Defensive Efficiency108.6

-2.8Net Efficiency2.8

45.6%Effective FG%49.2%

53.0%True Shooting %55.5%

15.1%Turnover Rate16.9%

61.4%Free Throw Rate30.2%

42.1%3-Point Rate38.1%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

UNLV won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.