
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
72.1%Colgate
27.9%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL148.7
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -258

Bucknell
10-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 77
Projected Total148.7
Projected ScoreBucknell 72
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index35.7
111.7Offensive Efficiency99.5
109.0Defensive Efficiency112.8
2.7Net Efficiency-13.3
-2.0Strength of Schedule2.0
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
68.4Tempo67.7
54.5%Effective FG%48.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.0%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
30.0%Free Throw Rate30.7%
1.8Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (111.7–99.5), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.8), net efficiency (2.7–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-2.0), free throw rate (30.7–30.0).