
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.3%UT Rio Grande Valley
38.7%New Orleans
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -158

New Orleans
16-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreNew Orleans 74
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index47.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency107.0
103.1Defensive Efficiency109.6
9.5Net Efficiency-2.6
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.2
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency0.4
67.4Tempo70.8
55.7%Effective FG%50.5%
17.9%Turnover Rate20.2%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
29.6%Free Throw Rate48.4%
6.4Average Margin-1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.6), net efficiency (9.5–-2.6).
New Orleans COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (35.7–29.2), free throw rate (48.4–29.6).