Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
90.3%Merrimack
9.7%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL136.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -931
Rider logo

Rider

4-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Projected Total136.1
Projected ScoreRider 62

Team Comparison

53.7MMH Power Index29.1
106.4Offensive Efficiency96.3
103.2Defensive Efficiency115.3
3.2Net Efficiency-19.0
0.7Strength of Schedule-0.9
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
64.4Tempo65.9
49.3%Effective FG%43.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
39.5%Free Throw Rate31.5%
2.1Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.3), net efficiency (3.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–24.7).
Final
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
7347
Rider logo
Rider
Merrimack by 2657.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATRider
26-46FG16-52
57.0%FG%31.0%
5-133PT3-14
38.0%3PT%21.0%
16-21FT12-23
76.0%FT%52.0%
38Rebounds25
9Offensive Rebounds14
15Assists11
11Turnovers8
3Steals7
2Blocks5
16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tye DorsetG357-82-22-241000018
Ernest SheltonG355-101-64-531000015
Kevair KennedyG353-100-08-935200014
Andrés MarreroG283-32-22-331100010
KC UgwuakaziF143-40-00-27201006
Dylan VeilletteF103-30-00-05000006
Todd BrognaF291-20-10-06401002
Jaylen StinsonG71-40-20-00100002
Brendan JohnsonG40-20-00-00000000
Brandon LegrisF30-00-00-00000000
Rider
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Flash BurtonG316-172-64-401100018
Caleb SmithG372-40-17-1472120011
Shemani FullerF164-60-01-45000009
Zion CruzG312-110-20-12332004
Cole McCabeF161-41-20-03001003
AB CoulibalyG211-60-10-04210002
Jamir McNeilG240-10-10-00210000
Antwan WilsonG160-20-10-01100000
Kristupas KepežinskasG40-00-00-00000000
Davis BynumF20-10-00-00000000
Daniel HelterhoffF20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

57.5Possessions57.5
127.0Offensive Efficiency81.7
81.7Defensive Efficiency127.0
45.2Net Efficiency-45.2
62.0%Effective FG%33.7%
65.2%True Shooting %37.3%
19.0%Turnover Rate14.1%
45.7%Free Throw Rate44.2%
28.3%3-Point Rate26.9%
1.36Assist / Turnover1.38
Game Summary
Merrimack won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 57.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.