
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
90.3%Merrimack
9.7%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL136.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -931

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Projected Total136.1
Projected ScoreRider 62
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index29.1
106.4Offensive Efficiency96.3
103.2Defensive Efficiency115.3
3.2Net Efficiency-19.0
0.7Strength of Schedule-0.9
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
64.4Tempo65.9
49.3%Effective FG%43.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
39.5%Free Throw Rate31.5%
2.1Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.3), net efficiency (3.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–24.7).