Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.7%Clemson

53.3%California

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCalifornia -1.7

PROJECTED TOTAL144.2

MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -114

California

22-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 71

Projected Total144.2

Projected ScoreCalifornia 73

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricCalifornia

59.9MMH Power Index56.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency111.8

101.4Defensive Efficiency104.8

11.2Net Efficiency7.0

4.6Strength of Schedule2.8

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8

63.6Tempo69.9

53.0%Effective FG%52.6%

14.0%Turnover Rate14.9%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%

38.1%Free Throw Rate36.8%

7.2Average Margin4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–56.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.8), defensive efficiency (101.4–104.8), net efficiency (11.2–7.0).

California COUNTERS WITHrecent form (1.8–-4.7).

Final

Clemson

77—55

California

Clemson by 22 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATCalifornia

27-49FG19-48

55.0%FG%40.0%

12-263PT4-13

46.0%3PT%31.0%

11-19FT13-15

58.0%FT%87.0%

29Rebounds27

4Offensive Rebounds4

16Assists7

10Turnovers14

7Steals5

5Blocks—

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
RJ Godfrey	F	23	6-8	0-0	1-4	5	0	1	1	13
Ace Buckner	G	23	3-6	2-4	5-6	3	4	1	1	13
Jake Wahlin	F	28	4-7	3-6	0-0	6	0	1	1	11
Carter Welling	F	14	4-7	0-1	3-5	1	1	0	1	11
Dallas Thomas	F	6	3-3	2-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	8
Jestin Porter	G	35	2-6	2-5	1-2	1	2	1	0	7
Butta Johnson	G	20	2-4	2-3	0-0	3	2	2	0	6
Nick Davidson	F	22	2-5	1-4	0-0	4	3	0	0	5
Chase Thompson	F	12	1-2	0-1	1-2	3	0	1	1	3
Dillon Hunter	G	16	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	3	0	0	0
Trent Steinour	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

California

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Justin Pippen	G	31	6-13	2-6	5-5	5	2	2	19
Chris Bell	F	29	5-10	2-3	1-2	3	0	1	13
Dai Dai Ames	G	33	5-13	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	12
John Camden	F	29	1-7	0-2	2-2	2	1	1	4
Mantas Kocanas	C	13	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	4
Milos Ilic	C	26	0-1	0-0	2-2	5	2	1	2
DeJuan Campbell	G	17	0-0	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	1
Semetri Carr	G	16	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0
Nolan Dorsey	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Dhiaukuei Manyiel Dut	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6

119.2Offensive Efficiency85.1

85.1Defensive Efficiency119.2

34.1Net Efficiency-34.1

67.3%Effective FG%43.8%

66.4%True Shooting %49.9%

15.6%Turnover Rate21.5%

38.8%Free Throw Rate31.3%

53.1%3-Point Rate27.1%

1.60Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

Clemson won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.