UNC Greensboro

15-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%UNC Greensboro

78.8%Furman

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFurman -10.4

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -372

Furman

22-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 73

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreFurman 83

Team Comparison

UNC GreensboroMetricFurman

46.7MMH Power Index53.9

112.6Offensive Efficiency113.3

115.3Defensive Efficiency105.1

-2.7Net Efficiency8.2

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.8

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6

69.8Tempo67.4

52.8%Effective FG%55.4%

14.6%Turnover Rate17.7%

28.7%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

41.7%Free Throw Rate32.6%

-1.9Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–46.7), offensive efficiency (113.3–112.6), defensive efficiency (105.1–115.3), net efficiency (8.2–-2.7).

UNC Greensboro COUNTERS WITHball security (14.6–17.7), free throw rate (41.7–32.6).

Final

UNC Greensboro

67—64

Furman

UNC Greensboro by 3 • 63.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNC GreensboroTEAM STATFurman

22-53FG23-53

42.0%FG%43.0%

10-193PT5-19

53.0%3PT%26.0%

13-19FT13-17

68.0%FT%76.0%

32Rebounds36

8Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists13

9Turnovers11

7Steals7

3Blocks4

18Fouls18

Player Box Score

UNC Greensboro

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Justin Neely	F	35	8-14	2-2	6-10	13	1	3	1	24
Noah Norgaard	G	29	4-6	3-4	0-0	2	4	0	0	11
Donald Whitehead Jr.	G	18	2-5	2-4	5-5	0	1	0	0	11
Lilian Marville	G	32	4-11	1-3	0-0	2	2	1	0	9
KJ Younger	G	27	1-5	0-2	2-3	3	0	0	0	4
Clinton Efinda	F	18	1-4	1-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	3
Chane Bynum	F	7	1-4	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Valentino Pinedo	F	26	1-2	0-0	0-1	4	0	1	1	2
Domas Kauzonas	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0
Clyde Bailey II	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Furman

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cooper Bowser	F	31	8-12	0-0	4-6	6	2	1	1	20
Alex Wilkins	G	25	5-12	0-3	5-6	0	5	2	1	15
Asa Thomas	G	32	3-10	3-10	0-0	5	3	1	1	9
Charles Johnston	F	28	2-4	1-1	2-2	9	0	0	0	7
Ben Vander Wal	F	21	3-5	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	6
Tom House	G	26	1-4	1-3	2-3	4	0	2	0	5
Eddrin Bronson	G	19	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	2	0	1	2
Cole Bowser	G	18	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.1Possessions63.1

106.2Offensive Efficiency101.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency106.2

4.8Net Efficiency-4.8

50.9%Effective FG%48.1%

54.0%True Shooting %52.4%

14.3%Turnover Rate17.4%

35.8%Free Throw Rate32.1%

35.8%3-Point Rate35.8%

1.22Assist / Turnover1.18

Game Summary

UNC Greensboro won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 63.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.