
Rice
13-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.9%Rice
86.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -619

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 70
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreUAB 83
Team Comparison
45.1MMH Power Index56.9
108.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
109.2Defensive Efficiency102.9
-0.9Net Efficiency7.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule0.4
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
68.3Tempo71.7
49.7%Effective FG%48.8%
17.8%Turnover Rate12.4%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
34.7%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-0.6Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (110.5–108.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.2), net efficiency (7.6–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.7–48.8), offensive rebounding (35.7–32.7).