
Texas Southern
12-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.2%Texas Southern
70.8%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -242

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas Southern 73
Projected Total151.7
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 79
Team Comparison
40.8MMH Power Index44.2
104.2Offensive Efficiency104.7
106.7Defensive Efficiency106.9
-2.5Net Efficiency-2.2
-6.3Strength of Schedule-3.3
3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
69.8Tempo72.0
50.3%Effective FG%51.9%
18.4%Turnover Rate19.2%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
39.3%Free Throw Rate41.9%
-1.8Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–40.8), offensive efficiency (104.7–104.2), net efficiency (-2.2–-2.5), strength of schedule (-3.3–-6.3).
Texas Southern COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.7–106.9), ball security (18.4–19.2).