Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.9%Alabama A&M

60.1%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -4.2

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -151

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreGrambling 73

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricGrambling

42.3MMH Power Index41.4

105.9Offensive Efficiency100.7

106.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-0.7Net Efficiency0.3

-6.8Strength of Schedule-5.7

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

68.0Tempo69.9

49.7%Effective FG%49.2%

16.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

45.7%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-0.5Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Alabama A&M

66—58

Grambling

Alabama A&M by 8 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATGrambling

21-50FG15-50

42.0%FG%30.0%

7-183PT4-24

39.0%3PT%17.0%

17-24FT24-27

71.0%FT%89.0%

33Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds9

10Assists13

14Turnovers12

8Steals9

5Blocks5

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
James Graham III	G	38	7-13	1-4	4-5	1	1	0	2	19
Kintavious Dozier	G	34	4-11	2-5	3-4	2	3	4	0	13
Sami Pissis	G	31	3-7	2-4	3-4	5	0	2	0	11
Koron Davis	G	19	2-7	0-1	2-2	5	0	0	0	6
PJ Eason	F	30	2-3	0-0	1-3	6	3	0	2	5
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	15	1-3	1-2	2-2	2	3	2	0	5
Tajden Davis	G	7	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Lou Hutchinson	G	16	1-3	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	1	2
James Flippin	F	7	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Samuel Onu	F	3	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Roderick Coffee III	F	39	4-15	0-7	9-11	3	4	2	0	17
Jamil Muttilib	G	33	5-12	1-5	1-1	3	1	1	3	12
Rickey Ballard	F	29	2-5	2-5	2-3	4	2	3	1	8
Devyn Franklin	G	23	2-5	0-0	4-4	10	4	0	1	8
Derrius Ward	G	36	1-8	1-5	4-4	6	0	2	0	7
Randarius Jones	C	12	0-0	0-0	4-4	0	1	0	0	4
P.J. Edwards	G	21	1-5	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	0	2
Saliou Seye	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Chancellor Perkins	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

99.1Offensive Efficiency87.1

87.1Defensive Efficiency99.1

12.0Net Efficiency-12.0

49.0%Effective FG%34.0%

53.7%True Shooting %46.2%

20.8%Turnover Rate18.2%

48.0%Free Throw Rate54.0%

36.0%3-Point Rate48.0%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.