
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
70.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
29.9%Nicholls
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -4.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -234

Nicholls
14-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScoreNicholls 71
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index43.6
112.6Offensive Efficiency105.3
103.1Defensive Efficiency109.0
9.5Net Efficiency-3.7
-1.9Strength of Schedule-0.4
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
67.4Tempo68.7
55.7%Effective FG%51.0%
17.9%Turnover Rate17.3%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %28.5%
29.6%Free Throw Rate35.3%
6.4Average Margin-2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–43.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.0), net efficiency (9.5–-3.7).
Nicholls COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-1.9), ball security (17.3–17.9), free throw rate (35.3–29.6).