Notre Dame

13-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.6%Notre Dame

87.4%SMU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSMU -13.0

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -694

SMU

20-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 73

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreSMU 86

Team Comparison

Notre DameMetricSMU

49.7MMH Power Index62.5

110.3Offensive Efficiency118.2

111.2Defensive Efficiency109.6

-0.9Net Efficiency8.6

4.7Strength of Schedule7.0

-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3

68.0Tempo71.1

53.0%Effective FG%55.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.7%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate31.3%

-0.6Average Margin6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–49.7), offensive efficiency (118.2–110.3), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.2), net efficiency (8.6–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.7–31.3).

Final

Notre Dame

81—89

SMU

SMU by 8 • 69.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATSMU

31-58FG32-61

53.0%FG%52.0%

11-253PT13-28

44.0%3PT%46.0%

8-14FT12-16

57.0%FT%75.0%

26Rebounds38

7Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists25

12Turnovers14

8Steals6

3Blocks5

15Fouls17

Player Box Score

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Haralson	F	31	9-13	0-0	5-8	3	1	1	1	23
Cole Certa	G	37	6-13	4-9	0-1	3	2	0	0	16
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	32	5-11	5-9	1-2	2	2	1	1	16
Brady Koehler	F	23	4-5	1-1	2-2	6	2	2	0	11
Sir Mohammed	G	17	3-5	1-1	0-0	2	6	2	0	7
Carson Towt	F	24	2-3	0-0	0-1	4	0	1	0	4
Logan Imes	G	20	2-7	0-4	0-0	2	3	1	0	4
Garrett Sundra	F	15	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Ryder Frost	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaron Pierre Jr.	G	34	8-15	3-8	3-3	8	6	1	1	22
Boopie Miller	G	37	7-13	4-5	2-2	3	7	3	0	20
Corey Washington	F	27	5-10	3-6	1-3	2	1	0	1	14
Samet Yigitoglu	C	27	5-8	0-0	1-3	10	4	0	1	11
Jaden Toombs	C	14	4-4	0-0	1-1	2	0	0	0	9
B.J. Edwards	G	31	1-6	1-5	4-4	8	6	2	0	7
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	F	13	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	3
Sam Walters	F	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
B.J. Davis-Ray	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Mitchell Holmes	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.2Possessions69.2

117.1Offensive Efficiency128.6

128.6Defensive Efficiency117.1

-11.6Net Efficiency11.6

62.9%Effective FG%63.1%

62.6%True Shooting %64.9%

17.2%Turnover Rate20.4%

24.1%Free Throw Rate26.2%

43.1%3-Point Rate45.9%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.79

Game Summary

SMU won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 69.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.