San José State logo

San José State

9-24
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.3%San José State
84.7%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -12.0
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -554
UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSan José State 73
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreUNLV 85

Team Comparison

42MMH Power Index52.8
108.7Offensive Efficiency111.0
118.5Defensive Efficiency109.6
-9.8Net Efficiency1.4
1.8Strength of Schedule2.7
-8.6Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
66.2Tempo71.4
50.8%Effective FG%53.7%
15.2%Turnover Rate17.2%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
34.2%Free Throw Rate41.6%
-6.5Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNLV HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–42.0), offensive efficiency (111.0–108.7), defensive efficiency (109.6–118.5), net efficiency (1.4–-9.8).
San José State COUNTERS WITHball security (15.2–17.2).
Final
San José State logo
San José State
7582
UNLV logo
UNLV
UNLV by 767.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

San José StateTEAM STATUNLV
24-63FG30-61
38.0%FG%49.0%
11-243PT7-22
46.0%3PT%32.0%
16-20FT15-21
80.0%FT%71.0%
34Rebounds43
11Offensive Rebounds13
16Assists16
7Turnovers9
5Steals4
4Blocks7
16Fouls14

Player Box Score

San José State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Colby GarlandG4010-253-60-052200023
Pasha GoodarziG405-123-78-842010021
Japhet MoupadeleF144-53-40-031010011
Melvin Bell Jr.G363-60-03-64310009
Sadraque NgaNgaF262-72-33-48000009
Adrian MyersF390-80-42-26822002
Marcus OverstreetF50-00-00-01000000
UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dra Gibbs-LawhornG4010-194-80-045300024
Kimani HamiltonF366-93-48-9104000023
Tyrin JonesF246-80-01-240030013
Issac WilliamsonG234-100-41-26100009
Walter BrownF352-80-41-26402005
Emmanuel StephenC151-30-01-27012003
Al GreenG151-30-10-01100002
Jacob BannarbieF50-00-02-22000002
Howie Fleming Jr.G50-10-11-20100001
Naas CunninghamF20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8
110.6Offensive Efficiency120.9
120.9Defensive Efficiency110.6
-10.3Net Efficiency10.3
46.8%Effective FG%54.9%
51.7%True Shooting %57.8%
10.2%Turnover Rate13.4%
31.7%Free Throw Rate34.4%
38.1%3-Point Rate36.1%
2.29Assist / Turnover1.78
Game Summary
UNLV won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.