
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.9%Colgate
33.1%Holy Cross
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -3.5
PROJECTED TOTAL147.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -202

Holy Cross
11-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 75
Projected Total147.3
Projected ScoreHoly Cross 72
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index37.9
111.7Offensive Efficiency103.3
109.0Defensive Efficiency110.9
2.7Net Efficiency-7.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule-2.6
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
68.4Tempo66.1
54.5%Effective FG%49.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %22.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate32.5%
1.8Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–37.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–103.3), defensive efficiency (109.0–110.9), net efficiency (2.7–-7.6).
Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (32.5–30.0).