UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.0%UAB

80.0%Tulsa

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulsa -9.9

PROJECTED TOTAL159.3

MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -400

Tulsa

30-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 75

Projected Total159.3

Projected ScoreTulsa 85

Team Comparison

UABMetricTulsa

56.9MMH Power Index64.8

110.5Offensive Efficiency121.1

102.9Defensive Efficiency104.8

7.6Net Efficiency16.3

0.4Strength of Schedule0.0

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3

71.7Tempo70.2

48.8%Effective FG%55.4%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.4%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%

5.4Average Margin11.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–56.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.5), net efficiency (16.3–7.6), recent form (10.3–2.9).

UAB COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–104.8), strength of schedule (0.4–0.0), ball security (12.4–15.4).

Final

UAB

68—63

Tulsa

UAB by 5 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTulsa

25-66FG25-58

38.0%FG%43.0%

9-223PT7-26

41.0%3PT%27.0%

9-13FT6-9

69.0%FT%67.0%

36Rebounds41

12Offensive Rebounds9

16Assists11

6Turnovers14

10Steals4

5Blocks4

13Fouls10

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dayjaun Anderson	G	38	7-17	4-9	2-2	5	1	2	0	20
Evan Chatman	F	38	4-9	2-4	3-4	13	3	1	3	13
Daniel Rivera	F	34	4-13	0-0	1-1	7	3	3	2	9
Salim London	G	29	4-8	1-2	0-0	2	3	1	0	9
Chance Westry	G	33	2-10	0-2	3-6	3	5	1	0	7
Ahmad Robinson	G	8	2-2	1-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	5
Quaran McPherson	G	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Ari Gooch	G	9	1-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2

Tulsa

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Miles Barnstable	G	35	6-14	3-10	0-0	3	1	1	0	15
Tylen Riley	G	31	7-15	1-2	0-0	9	5	0	0	15
Tyler Behrend	F	27	3-3	0-0	4-5	9	0	0	1	10
David Green	F	28	4-12	1-5	0-2	2	1	0	1	9
Romad Dean	F	13	1-2	0-1	2-2	3	1	1	1	4
Jaylen Lawal	G	9	2-5	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	4
Ade Popoola	G	28	1-6	1-6	0-0	3	0	1	0	3
Myles Rigsby	G	16	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	3
Ian Smikle	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	0
KJ Martin Jr.	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8

101.8Offensive Efficiency94.3

94.3Defensive Efficiency101.8

7.5Net Efficiency-7.5

44.7%Effective FG%49.1%

47.1%True Shooting %50.6%

9.1%Turnover Rate20.8%

19.7%Free Throw Rate15.5%

33.3%3-Point Rate44.8%

2.67Assist / Turnover0.79

Game Summary

UAB won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.