Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.6%Quinnipiac

69.4%Siena

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSiena -5.9

PROJECTED TOTAL141.7

MODEL MONEYLINESiena -227

Siena

23-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 68

Projected Total141.7

Projected ScoreSiena 74

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricSiena

51MMH Power Index53.8

106.8Offensive Efficiency109.2

102.1Defensive Efficiency102.2

4.7Net Efficiency7.0

-2.3Strength of Schedule-0.5

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0

70.5Tempo64.4

48.9%Effective FG%50.7%

15.6%Turnover Rate15.8%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

34.1%Free Throw Rate34.9%

3.4Average Margin4.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Siena HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (109.2–106.8), net efficiency (7.0–4.7), strength of schedule (-0.5–-2.3).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–102.2), ball security (15.6–15.8), offensive rebounding (34.1–31.4).

Final

Quinnipiac

74—62

Siena

Quinnipiac by 12 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATSiena

26-63FG22-60

41.0%FG%37.0%

10-263PT4-17

38.0%3PT%24.0%

12-21FT14-16

57.0%FT%88.0%

41Rebounds38

13Offensive Rebounds11

11Assists10

7Turnovers10

6Steals3

4Blocks2

15Fouls17

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	37	8-16	3-6	2-4	7	3	1	0	21
Jaden Zimmerman	G	34	5-11	3-6	4-7	4	2	0	1	17
Asim Jones	G	33	5-13	2-6	0-2	2	2	2	0	12
Keith McKnight	G	18	2-5	0-0	3-4	3	0	2	0	7
Tai Turnage	G	10	1-4	1-2	3-4	0	3	0	0	6
Grant Randall	F	28	2-7	0-4	0-0	6	1	0	2	4
Spence Wewe	F	25	2-5	0-0	0-0	18	0	0	1	4
Braylan Ritvo	F	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Nate Guerengomba	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Samson Reilly	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Siena

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Gavin Doty	G	40	6-15	1-3	8-8	16	5	1	0	21
Isaiah Henderson	F	28	4-9	3-6	4-4	1	1	1	0	15
Francis Folefac	F	35	6-13	0-0	2-2	6	0	0	2	14
Justice Shoats	G	35	3-8	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	6
Antonio Chandler	F	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	4
Christian Jones	G	18	1-5	0-2	0-0	2	2	1	0	2
Brendan Coyle	F	19	0-6	0-6	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Riley Mulvey	C	9	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8

110.8Offensive Efficiency92.8

92.8Defensive Efficiency110.8

18.0Net Efficiency-18.0

49.2%Effective FG%40.0%

50.7%True Shooting %45.9%

10.5%Turnover Rate15.0%

33.3%Free Throw Rate26.7%

41.3%3-Point Rate28.3%

1.57Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.