Brown

9-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.7%Brown

87.3%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -11.7

PROJECTED TOTAL137.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -687

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBrown 63

Projected Total137.9

Projected ScoreHarvard 75

Team Comparison

BrownMetricHarvard

39.9MMH Power Index52.6

102.7Offensive Efficiency108.1

102.3Defensive Efficiency102.9

0.4Net Efficiency5.2

-4.9Strength of Schedule-0.1

-11.1Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

68.5Tempo64.8

50.4%Effective FG%53.4%

18.8%Turnover Rate17.2%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

28.2%Free Throw Rate27.9%

0.3Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–39.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–102.7), net efficiency (5.2–0.4), strength of schedule (-0.1–-4.9).

Brown COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.3–102.9), offensive rebounding (30.0–26.3), free throw rate (28.2–27.9).

Final

Brown

53—56

Harvard

Harvard by 3 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BrownTEAM STATHarvard

21-51FG19-49

41.0%FG%39.0%

2-183PT7-22

11.0%3PT%32.0%

9-15FT11-18

60.0%FT%61.0%

34Rebounds34

10Offensive Rebounds11

11Assists10

14Turnovers15

10Steals10

4Blocks3

18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Brown

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Landon Lewis	F	32	8-14	0-0	1-4	6	4	2	0	17
Isaiah Langham	G	25	3-7	0-3	4-6	4	1	1	2	10
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	G	31	3-7	1-3	0-0	4	1	5	0	7
N'famara Dabo	F	22	3-4	0-0	0-1	7	1	0	1	6
David Rochester	F	22	2-2	0-0	2-2	6	2	0	0	6
Luke Paragon	G	25	1-6	1-5	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Jeremiah Jenkins	G	23	0-5	0-4	2-2	2	2	2	0	2
Adrian Uchidiuno	G	16	1-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Charlie O'Sullivan	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	35	7-12	1-1	5-7	3	1	3	0	20
Tey Barbour	G	38	5-10	3-7	4-5	2	0	0	0	17
Thomas Batties III	F	34	3-13	2-7	0-0	6	2	0	2	8
Chandler Pigge	G	35	2-5	1-2	2-5	10	2	3	0	7
Frankie Mannino	G	14	2-3	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	0	4
Ben Eisendrath	G	32	0-4	0-4	0-0	2	5	4	0	0
Kenan Parrish	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Xavier Nesbitt	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9

85.6Offensive Efficiency90.5

90.5Defensive Efficiency85.6

-4.8Net Efficiency4.8

43.1%Effective FG%45.9%

45.6%True Shooting %48.7%

22.5%Turnover Rate24.4%

29.4%Free Throw Rate36.7%

35.3%3-Point Rate44.9%

0.79Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

Harvard won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.