
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.0%Columbia
65.0%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -186

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 74
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScorePennsylvania 77
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index52.9
112.4Offensive Efficiency108.6
105.2Defensive Efficiency106.4
7.2Net Efficiency2.2
-1.7Strength of Schedule1.9
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
68.2Tempo69.9
54.4%Effective FG%50.9%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
28.8%Free Throw Rate36.3%
5.0Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.4–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.4), net efficiency (7.2–2.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–50.9).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.9–51.9), strength of schedule (1.9–-1.7), recent form (2.3–-2.4).