Yale logo

Yale

23-7
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
71.4%Yale
28.6%Harvard
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL141.6
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -250
Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreYale 73
Projected Total141.6
Projected ScoreHarvard 69

Team Comparison

65.4MMH Power Index52.6
121.4Offensive Efficiency108.1
105.8Defensive Efficiency102.9
15.6Net Efficiency5.2
1.6Strength of Schedule-0.1
8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3
64.5Tempo64.8
56.8%Effective FG%53.4%
13.9%Turnover Rate17.2%
33.3%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
34.4%Free Throw Rate27.9%
10.1Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–52.6), offensive efficiency (121.4–108.1), net efficiency (15.6–5.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-0.1).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–105.8).
Final
Yale logo
Yale
7675
Harvard logo
Harvard
Yale by 165.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATHarvard
24-58FG31-61
41.0%FG%51.0%
11-253PT6-22
44.0%3PT%27.0%
17-20FT7-8
85.0%FT%88.0%
36Rebounds30
12Offensive Rebounds7
11Assists12
10Turnovers8
4Steals10
1Blocks6
11Fouls13

Player Box Score

Yale
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Isaac CeliscarF414-80-29-12141100017
Jordan BrathwaiteG265-105-92-211000017
Casey SimmonsG396-102-22-281010016
Trevor MullinG322-102-62-23200008
Riley FoxF183-101-30-00100007
Samson AletanC362-40-00-03000004
Nick TownsendF171-20-02-21330004
Devon ArlingtonG131-31-20-00100003
Jack SullivanF30-10-10-01100000
Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Thomas Batties IIIF429-154-91-271040023
Chandler PiggeG416-111-40-063300013
Ben EisendrathG404-60-05-532320013
Robert HintonG416-130-10-072100012
Tey BarbourG405-121-81-153200012
Frankie ManninoG91-10-00-01000002
Kenan ParrishF70-20-00-00010000
Xavier NesbittG50-10-00-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7
115.7Offensive Efficiency114.2
114.2Defensive Efficiency115.7
1.5Net Efficiency-1.5
50.9%Effective FG%55.7%
56.3%True Shooting %57.9%
15.3%Turnover Rate12.2%
34.5%Free Throw Rate13.1%
43.1%3-Point Rate36.1%
1.10Assist / Turnover1.50
Game Summary
Yale won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.