Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.6%Bucknell
89.4%Boston University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBoston University -13.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -843
Boston University logo

Boston University

16-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 67
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreBoston University 81

Team Comparison

35.7MMH Power Index50.3
99.5Offensive Efficiency115.3
112.8Defensive Efficiency113.1
-13.3Net Efficiency2.2
2.0Strength of Schedule-2.7
-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.2
67.7Tempo65.4
48.4%Effective FG%58.6%
19.0%Turnover Rate17.7%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %27.4%
30.7%Free Throw Rate32.2%
-8.9Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Boston University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–35.7), offensive efficiency (115.3–99.5), net efficiency (2.2–-13.3), recent form (11.2–-11.5).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.8–113.1), strength of schedule (2.0–-2.7).
Final
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
6982
Boston University logo
Boston University
Boston University by 1365.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BucknellTEAM STATBoston University
27-59FG24-57
46.0%FG%42.0%
9-273PT13-29
33.0%3PT%45.0%
6-10FT21-23
60.0%FT%91.0%
23Rebounds44
6Offensive Rebounds16
15Assists16
8Turnovers13
9Steals5
4Blocks3
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Achile SpadoneG407-142-73-552320019
Amon DörriesC407-121-30-162100015
Jayden WilliamsG356-131-42-224210015
Aleksander PachuckiG314-83-61-231100012
Quin BergerG202-62-50-01210006
Jacob MeachemG161-40-00-01410002
Patrick O'BrienF180-20-20-01001000
Boston University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Michael McNairG389-186-114-470000028
Sam HughesF353-83-66-691400015
Chance GladdenG374-132-54-456110014
Ben DeftyF304-70-05-766010013
Donte Tisinger Jr.G173-62-40-03000008
Azmar AbdullahG331-40-32-26300004
Quinn NielsenF100-10-00-04001000

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4
105.5Offensive Efficiency125.4
125.4Defensive Efficiency105.5
-19.9Net Efficiency19.9
53.4%Effective FG%53.5%
54.1%True Shooting %60.4%
12.2%Turnover Rate20.0%
16.9%Free Throw Rate40.4%
45.8%3-Point Rate50.9%
1.88Assist / Turnover1.23
Game Summary
Boston University won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.