Furman

22-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

90.5%Furman

9.5%VMI

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFurman -13.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.6

MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -953

VMI

5-26

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFurman 81

Projected Total148.6

Projected ScoreVMI 68

Team Comparison

FurmanMetricVMI

53.9MMH Power Index29.1

113.3Offensive Efficiency105.1

105.1Defensive Efficiency117.4

8.2Net Efficiency-12.3

-1.8Strength of Schedule-5.4

4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-21.9

67.4Tempo66.2

55.4%Effective FG%48.9%

17.7%Turnover Rate14.7%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %26.4%

32.6%Free Throw Rate29.9%

5.5Average Margin-8.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.1–117.4), net efficiency (8.2–-12.3).

VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–17.7).

Final

Furman

90—72

VMI

Furman by 18 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

FurmanTEAM STATVMI

31-59FG21-63

53.0%FG%33.0%

13-383PT13-43

34.0%3PT%30.0%

15-20FT17-20

75.0%FT%85.0%

42Rebounds30

9Offensive Rebounds9

21Assists15

12Turnovers7

3Steals8

4Blocks2

14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Furman

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Asa Thomas	G	32	8-16	6-13	3-3	5	5	0	0	25
Cooper Bowser	F	30	6-6	0-0	2-2	4	3	0	3	14
Charles Johnston	F	22	5-8	1-4	0-0	10	2	0	0	11
Tom House	G	17	3-6	3-6	0-0	4	0	0	0	9
Ben Vander Wal	F	30	1-1	0-0	6-8	7	5	1	1	8
Alex Wilkins	G	28	3-9	1-6	1-1	1	6	0	0	8
Cole Bowser	G	18	2-4	1-3	2-2	4	0	1	0	7
Eddrin Bronson	G	17	2-5	1-4	1-4	3	0	0	0	6
Abijah Franklin	G	2	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Collin O'Neal	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Owen Ritger	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

VMI

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
TJ Johnson	F	39	8-19	5-14	5-5	6	0	2	0	26
Tan Yildizoglu	G	33	3-10	1-4	6-8	9	5	2	0	13
Linus Holmstrom	G	29	4-6	3-5	2-3	4	2	1	0	13
Cal Liston	F	39	3-13	2-12	2-2	3	3	1	0	10
Mario Tatum Jr.	G	32	1-6	1-4	2-2	5	4	1	0	5
Walker Andrews	G	8	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Kaden Stuckey	F	20	1-7	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	2	2

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

126.8Offensive Efficiency101.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency126.8

25.4Net Efficiency-25.4

63.6%Effective FG%43.7%

65.7%True Shooting %49.7%

16.8%Turnover Rate9.9%

33.9%Free Throw Rate31.7%

64.4%3-Point Rate68.3%

1.75Assist / Turnover2.14

Game Summary

Furman won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.