Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.1%Texas A&M

84.9%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -11.7

PROJECTED TOTAL161.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -562

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75

Projected Total161.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricVanderbilt

58MMH Power Index68.9

116.1Offensive Efficiency120.9

108.4Defensive Efficiency105.7

7.7Net Efficiency15.2

4.8Strength of Schedule7.4

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.1Tempo70.9

53.5%Effective FG%55.3%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.5%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

37.5%Free Throw Rate39.3%

5.3Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–58.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–116.1), defensive efficiency (105.7–108.4), net efficiency (15.2–7.7).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.8).

Final

Texas A&M

69—82

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 13 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATVanderbilt

28-72FG25-57

39.0%FG%44.0%

8-293PT9-29

28.0%3PT%31.0%

5-10FT23-29

50.0%FT%79.0%

39Rebounds40

16Offensive Rebounds12

10Assists14

11Turnovers9

6Steals6

3Blocks3

24Fouls16

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marcus Hill	G	31	9-16	1-4	1-2	4	1	2	0	20
Ali Dibba	G	22	3-8	1-3	2-4	8	0	2	0	9
Zach Clemence	F	14	4-5	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	9
Rashaun Agee	F	27	3-12	0-1	2-4	11	0	0	2	8
Pop Isaacs	G	24	3-8	2-5	0-0	2	2	1	0	8
Rylan Griffen	G	22	2-8	1-7	0-0	2	4	0	0	5
Jacari Lane	G	20	1-6	1-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	3
Rubén Dominguez	G	19	1-6	1-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Federiko Federiko	F	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	1	1	1	2
Josh Holloway	G	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Jamie Vinson	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Nickel	F	35	8-14	5-11	4-5	3	1	0	1	25
AK Okereke	F	33	5-8	2-4	11-14	5	3	2	0	23
Devin McGlockton	F	27	6-10	1-3	4-4	8	0	0	1	17
Chandler Bing	G	31	4-9	1-4	2-2	6	0	0	1	11
Tyler Tanner	G	31	2-10	0-3	0-0	3	6	3	0	4
Jalen Washington	C	20	0-3	0-1	2-4	8	2	1	0	2
Mike James	G	18	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	2	0	0	0
Tyler Harris	F	5	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

98.9Offensive Efficiency117.5

117.5Defensive Efficiency98.9

-18.6Net Efficiency18.6

44.4%Effective FG%51.8%

45.0%True Shooting %57.9%

15.3%Turnover Rate13.3%

13.9%Free Throw Rate50.9%

40.3%3-Point Rate50.9%

0.91Assist / Turnover1.56

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.