
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
65.4%SMU
34.6%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL158.7
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -189

Syracuse
15-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 81
Projected Total158.7
Projected ScoreSyracuse 78
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index52.2
118.2Offensive Efficiency109.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency106.6
8.6Net Efficiency2.6
7.0Strength of Schedule5.6
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
71.1Tempo69.0
55.7%Effective FG%52.9%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
31.3%Free Throw Rate36.2%
6.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–52.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–109.2), net efficiency (8.6–2.6), strength of schedule (7.0–5.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–109.6), ball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (36.2–31.3).