
Navy
26-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.4%Navy
40.6%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL145.6
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -146

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNavy 74
Projected Total145.6
Projected ScoreColgate 72
Team Comparison
56.8MMH Power Index48.8
113.2Offensive Efficiency111.7
97.6Defensive Efficiency109.0
15.6Net Efficiency2.7
-8.1Strength of Schedule-2.0
16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
65.9Tempo68.4
53.7%Effective FG%54.5%
17.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
40.9%Free Throw Rate30.0%
10.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Navy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–48.8), offensive efficiency (113.2–111.7), defensive efficiency (97.6–109.0), net efficiency (15.6–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-8.1), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.7), ball security (14.8–17.1).