UAlbany logo

UAlbany

11-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.4%UAlbany
36.6%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAlbany -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAlbany -173
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAlbany 70
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreBinghamton 67

Team Comparison

41.9MMH Power Index32.4
107.9Offensive Efficiency102.2
108.8Defensive Efficiency112.3
-0.9Net Efficiency-10.1
-6.1Strength of Schedule-6.0
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
64.3Tempo64.2
52.8%Effective FG%51.3%
18.6%Turnover Rate18.5%
34.3%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
25.0%Free Throw Rate42.8%
-0.6Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAlbany HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAlbany holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.9–32.4), offensive efficiency (107.9–102.2), defensive efficiency (108.8–112.3), net efficiency (-0.9–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.1), ball security (18.5–18.6), free throw rate (42.8–25.0).
Final
UAlbany logo
UAlbany
7774
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
UAlbany by 368.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UAlbanyTEAM STATBinghamton
23-51FG22-49
45.0%FG%45.0%
8-213PT7-19
38.0%3PT%37.0%
23-30FT23-29
77.0%FT%79.0%
37Rebounds26
10Offensive Rebounds5
11Assists11
13Turnovers11
7Steals11
1Blocks5
18Fouls20

Player Box Score

UAlbany
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amir LindseyG405-103-710-1044200023
Okechukwu OkekeF316-120-03-5100310015
Tarique FosterF384-93-72-261200013
Isaac AbiddeF304-62-32-221000012
Jaden KempsonG403-120-45-8125000011
Ma'Kye TaylorF191-20-01-33000003
Miles RoseG20-00-00-00000000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wes Peterson Jr.G406-103-63-463220018
Jackson BenigniG373-93-77-710300016
Jeremiah QuigleyG405-110-14-725200014
Bryson WilsonG312-60-16-691100010
Zyier BeverlyF262-70-13-57003007
Stephan SnaggF143-30-00-01010006
Jake BlackburnG121-31-30-00220003

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6
112.2Offensive Efficiency107.9
107.9Defensive Efficiency112.2
4.4Net Efficiency-4.4
52.9%Effective FG%52.0%
59.0%True Shooting %58.9%
19.0%Turnover Rate16.0%
58.8%Free Throw Rate59.2%
41.2%3-Point Rate38.8%
0.85Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
UAlbany won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.