
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.8%Hofstra
62.2%UNC Wilmington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNC Wilmington -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL143.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUNC Wilmington -165

UNC Wilmington
27-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 70
Projected Total143.7
Projected ScoreUNC Wilmington 74
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index59.2
114.0Offensive Efficiency114.1
100.9Defensive Efficiency101.7
13.1Net Efficiency12.4
-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.5
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5
66.2Tempo66.9
52.2%Effective FG%51.1%
16.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %35.8%
32.0%Free Throw Rate41.7%
8.7Average Margin8.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–59.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–101.7), net efficiency (13.1–12.4), recent form (14.0–5.5).
UNC Wilmington COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.1–114.0), strength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), ball security (14.8–16.1).