Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.2%Lipscomb

71.8%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.5

PROJECTED TOTAL163.5

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -255

Queens University

21-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Projected Total163.5

Projected ScoreQueens University 84

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricQueens University

47.9MMH Power Index51.7

111.3Offensive Efficiency118.4

107.6Defensive Efficiency117.0

3.7Net Efficiency1.4

-2.5Strength of Schedule0.1

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

68.8Tempo71.4

54.8%Effective FG%56.6%

16.0%Turnover Rate14.8%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate37.6%

2.5Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.5), recent form (1.5–-1.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.4), average scoring margin (2.5–0.9).

Final

Lipscomb

81—87

Queens University

Queens University by 6 • 78.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATQueens University

31-69FG31-53

45.0%FG%58.0%

7-273PT9-22

26.0%3PT%41.0%

12-18FT16-24

67.0%FT%67.0%

35Rebounds29

13Offensive Rebounds5

12Assists20

15Turnovers18

8Steals9

3Blocks7

22Fouls19

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Grant Asman	F	29	7-18	1-8	1-3	3	0	0	1	16
Charlie Williams	C	14	5-7	2-3	0-0	2	2	0	1	12
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	29	3-8	1-1	3-4	5	7	4	0	10
Titas Sargiunas	F	25	2-4	1-3	4-6	3	2	1	0	9
Ross Candelino	G	33	3-10	0-6	2-2	8	1	1	0	8
Ethan Duncan	G	15	3-7	2-5	0-0	2	0	1	0	8
Kennedy Okpara	F	16	3-5	0-1	1-1	4	0	0	0	7
Cole Middleton	F	8	3-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	6
Kellan Boylan	F	17	2-3	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	1	5
Or Ashkenazi	F	14	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Avantae Parker	F	30	9-13	0-0	4-5	4	3	4	6	22
Yoav Berman	G	33	5-7	1-3	5-7	6	7	1	0	16
Nasir Mann	G	32	5-9	1-3	0-0	7	1	0	0	11
Chris Ashby	G	27	3-6	3-4	2-2	2	2	0	0	11
Carson Schwieger	F	27	3-7	3-7	0-0	3	0	0	0	9
Jordan Watford	G	24	2-3	0-0	5-9	4	3	2	0	9
Maban Jabriel	F	12	3-7	1-5	0-1	1	2	1	1	7
Kam Clark	F	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Gus Larson	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	0
Isaiah Henry	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.5Possessions78.5

103.2Offensive Efficiency110.8

110.8Defensive Efficiency103.2

-7.6Net Efficiency7.6

50.0%Effective FG%67.0%

52.2%True Shooting %67.5%

18.9%Turnover Rate23.3%

26.1%Free Throw Rate45.3%

39.1%3-Point Rate41.5%

0.80Assist / Turnover1.11

Game Summary

Queens University won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 78.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.