Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.7%Mississippi Valley State

96.3%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -22.1

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -2603

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 62

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 85

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricAlabama A&M

17.7MMH Power Index42.3

91.1Offensive Efficiency105.9

117.8Defensive Efficiency106.6

-26.7Net Efficiency-0.7

-4.1Strength of Schedule-6.8

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

70.5Tempo68.0

45.8%Effective FG%49.7%

21.8%Turnover Rate16.8%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

34.5%Free Throw Rate45.7%

-18.8Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–17.7), offensive efficiency (105.9–91.1), defensive efficiency (106.6–117.8), net efficiency (-0.7–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-6.8).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

65—72

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 7 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATAlabama A&M

22-51FG23-48

43.0%FG%48.0%

6-103PT5-17

60.0%3PT%29.0%

15-21FT21-29

71.0%FT%72.0%

29Rebounds31

8Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists9

11Turnovers10

8Steals7

—Blocks5

21Fouls18

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Michael James	G	40	6-12	4-5	5-5	4	2	2	21
Daniel Mayfield	F	40	6-16	1-1	3-4	7	3	3	16
Patrick Punch	G	40	4-9	1-4	3-4	4	1	1	12
Mussa Mzein	C	21	3-8	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	7
Tyrone Iroghama	G	19	3-4	0-0	0-2	4	1	2	6
X'Zaevion Barnett	G	37	0-1	0-0	3-4	5	5	0	3
Jonathan Pace	F	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	34	6-13	0-4	6-6	7	3	1	0	18
Koron Davis	G	28	3-7	1-3	4-4	4	1	0	0	11
James Graham III	G	27	4-8	1-3	1-2	3	1	1	1	10
Lou Hutchinson	G	20	3-5	2-3	2-2	2	0	1	0	10
Sami Pissis	G	24	3-5	1-2	0-0	2	1	2	0	7
PJ Eason	F	23	1-3	0-0	3-4	3	0	0	2	5
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	18	1-3	0-1	3-5	3	1	1	0	5
James Flippin	F	9	1-3	0-1	1-2	1	1	0	1	3
Samuel Onu	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-2	1	0	1	1	2
Tajden Davis	G	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Angok Anyang	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9

101.7Offensive Efficiency112.7

112.7Defensive Efficiency101.7

-11.0Net Efficiency11.0

49.0%Effective FG%53.1%

53.3%True Shooting %58.3%

17.2%Turnover Rate15.7%

41.2%Free Throw Rate60.4%

19.6%3-Point Rate35.4%

1.09Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.