
Stephen F. Austin
28-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.2%Stephen F. Austin
50.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL144.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -103

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStephen F. Austin 72
Projected Total144.9
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73
Team Comparison
60.1MMH Power Index55.8
114.3Offensive Efficiency112.6
99.4Defensive Efficiency103.1
14.9Net Efficiency9.5
-1.8Strength of Schedule-1.9
4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
67.0Tempo67.4
52.2%Effective FG%55.7%
13.9%Turnover Rate17.9%
34.3%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
30.3%Free Throw Rate29.6%
10.0Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stephen F. Austin HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStephen F. Austin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.1–55.8), offensive efficiency (114.3–112.6), defensive efficiency (99.4–103.1), net efficiency (14.9–9.5).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHrecent form (12.3–4.7), shooting efficiency (55.7–52.2).