
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.5%Columbia
39.5%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL145.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -153

Princeton
9-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 74
Projected Total145.0
Projected ScorePrinceton 71
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index43.5
112.4Offensive Efficiency105.1
105.2Defensive Efficiency110.3
7.2Net Efficiency-5.2
-1.7Strength of Schedule1.7
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
68.2Tempo65.2
54.4%Effective FG%50.3%
19.1%Turnover Rate16.9%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
28.8%Free Throw Rate35.0%
5.0Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–43.5), offensive efficiency (112.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.2–110.3), net efficiency (7.2–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-1.7), ball security (16.9–19.1), free throw rate (35.0–28.8).