
Cornell
15-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
46.2%Cornell
53.8%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -116

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCornell 82
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScorePennsylvania 84
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index52.9
121.5Offensive Efficiency108.6
114.6Defensive Efficiency106.4
6.9Net Efficiency2.2
-1.1Strength of Schedule1.9
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
72.8Tempo69.9
60.1%Effective FG%50.9%
16.0%Turnover Rate15.4%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
29.7%Free Throw Rate36.3%
5.1Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cornell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCornell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–52.9), offensive efficiency (121.5–108.6), net efficiency (6.9–2.2), recent form (7.6–2.3).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.4–114.6), strength of schedule (1.9–-1.1), ball security (15.4–16.0).