
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%Tulane
87.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -675

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 70
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreUAB 83
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index56.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
109.9Defensive Efficiency102.9
-4.6Net Efficiency7.6
2.7Strength of Schedule0.4
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
68.7Tempo71.7
49.6%Effective FG%48.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate12.4%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
44.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-3.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.9), net efficiency (7.6–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.8), free throw rate (44.8–36.9).