Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

44.8%Merrimack

55.2%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL141.0

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -123

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 69

Projected Total141.0

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricQuinnipiac

53.7MMH Power Index51

106.4Offensive Efficiency106.8

103.2Defensive Efficiency102.1

3.2Net Efficiency4.7

0.7Strength of Schedule-2.3

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

64.4Tempo70.5

49.3%Effective FG%48.9%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

39.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%

2.1Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–51.0), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.3), recent form (12.9–2.2), shooting efficiency (49.3–48.9).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.8–106.4), defensive efficiency (102.1–103.2), net efficiency (4.7–3.2).

Final

Merrimack

56—49

Quinnipiac

Merrimack by 7 • 65.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATQuinnipiac

17-49FG17-61

35.0%FG%28.0%

4-163PT1-16

25.0%3PT%6.0%

18-20FT14-19

90.0%FT%74.0%

23Rebounds46

3Offensive Rebounds22

7Assists8

11Turnovers16

13Steals4

7Blocks7

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevair Kennedy	G	40	6-15	0-0	12-14	7	3	3	0	24
Ernest Shelton	G	39	4-15	2-10	2-2	3	2	2	0	12
KC Ugwuakazi	F	29	4-6	0-0	0-0	6	1	2	6	8
Andrés Marrero	G	20	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	2	0	6
Tye Dorset	G	40	1-7	0-1	2-2	2	1	4	0	4
Dylan Veillette	F	4	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	1	2
Todd Brogna	F	28	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Grant Randall	F	35	6-16	0-5	4-5	6	0	0	2	16
Amarri Monroe	F	38	3-14	0-3	4-6	15	1	2	3	10
Jaden Zimmerman	G	35	2-13	1-6	4-4	3	2	0	0	9
Keith McKnight	G	27	3-5	0-0	2-2	10	2	1	1	8
Spence Wewe	F	19	2-2	0-0	0-2	9	0	1	1	4
Tai Turnage	G	34	1-7	0-2	0-0	1	3	0	0	2
Asim Jones	G	9	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Nate Guerengomba	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3

85.8Offensive Efficiency75.0

75.0Defensive Efficiency85.8

10.7Net Efficiency-10.7

38.8%Effective FG%28.7%

47.9%True Shooting %35.0%

16.5%Turnover Rate25.0%

40.8%Free Throw Rate31.1%

32.7%3-Point Rate26.2%

0.64Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.