
Wright State
23-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.5%Wright State
15.5%Cleveland State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWright State -10.3
PROJECTED TOTAL164.4
MODEL MONEYLINEWright State -545

Cleveland State
11-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWright State 87
Projected Total164.4
Projected ScoreCleveland State 77
Team Comparison
57.1MMH Power Index37.3
116.4Offensive Efficiency111.6
106.5Defensive Efficiency120.2
9.9Net Efficiency-8.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule-1.7
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.6
69.2Tempo71.5
55.2%Effective FG%55.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate18.0%
33.9%Offensive Rebound %28.6%
38.3%Free Throw Rate38.7%
6.8Average Margin-6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wright State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWright State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–37.3), offensive efficiency (116.4–111.6), defensive efficiency (106.5–120.2), net efficiency (9.9–-8.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.0), free throw rate (38.7–38.3).