Charleston logo

Charleston

21-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.8%Charleston
55.2%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCampbell -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINECampbell -123
Campbell logo

Campbell

15-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 77
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreCampbell 79

Team Comparison

53.8MMH Power Index51.1
109.2Offensive Efficiency110.9
106.2Defensive Efficiency111.0
3.0Net Efficiency-0.1
1.9Strength of Schedule0.8
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
69.1Tempo70.6
50.6%Effective FG%51.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.4%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.1%Free Throw Rate44.2%
2.0Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Charleston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–51.1), defensive efficiency (106.2–111.0), net efficiency (3.0–-0.1), strength of schedule (1.9–0.8).
Campbell COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.9–109.2), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–29.6).
Final
Charleston logo
Charleston
6257
Campbell logo
Campbell
Charleston by 560.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CharlestonTEAM STATCampbell
25-55FG23-66
45.0%FG%35.0%
5-143PT2-21
36.0%3PT%10.0%
7-8FT9-10
88.0%FT%90.0%
34Rebounds39
10Offensive Rebounds18
13Assists8
13Turnovers7
3Steals11
9Blocks
15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Charleston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Christian ReevesC309-90-00-0150030018
Chol MachotC237-110-03-460060017
Chris Davis Jr.G223-62-30-04000008
Colby DugganF212-72-52-22100008
Jlynn CounterG361-80-22-23810004
Chadlyn TraylorG272-70-10-00100004
Jaxon PruntyG161-21-10-00010003
Martin KaluG250-50-20-04310000
Campbell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jeremiah JohnsonG406-140-24-452000016
DJ SmithG373-171-134-442400011
Dovydas ButkaF375-140-20-061100010
Muneer NewtonF204-50-00-011010008
Cam GregoryG373-71-30-03140007
Tasos CookG171-30-11-21100003
Chris Fields Jr.F121-60-00-04110002

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8
102.0Offensive Efficiency93.8
93.8Defensive Efficiency102.0
8.2Net Efficiency-8.2
50.0%Effective FG%36.4%
52.7%True Shooting %40.3%
21.0%Turnover Rate11.7%
14.5%Free Throw Rate15.2%
25.5%3-Point Rate31.8%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.14
Game Summary
Charleston won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.