Charleston logo

Charleston

21-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.8%Charleston
55.2%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCampbell -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINECampbell -123
Campbell logo

Campbell

15-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 77
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreCampbell 79

Team Comparison

53.8MMH Power Index51.1
109.2Offensive Efficiency110.9
106.2Defensive Efficiency111.0
3.0Net Efficiency-0.1
1.9Strength of Schedule0.8
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
69.1Tempo70.6
50.6%Effective FG%51.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.4%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.1%Free Throw Rate44.2%
2.0Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Charleston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–51.1), defensive efficiency (106.2–111.0), net efficiency (3.0–-0.1), strength of schedule (1.9–0.8).
Campbell COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.9–109.2), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–29.6).
Final
Charleston logo
Charleston
62—57
Campbell logo
Campbell
Charleston by 5 • 60.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CharlestonTEAM STATCampbell
25-55FG23-66
45.0%FG%35.0%
5-143PT2-21
36.0%3PT%10.0%
7-8FT9-10
88.0%FT%90.0%
34Rebounds39
10Offensive Rebounds18
13Assists8
13Turnovers7
3Steals11
9Blocks—
15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Charleston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Christian ReevesC309-90-00-0150030018
Chol MachotC237-110-03-460060017
Chris Davis Jr.G223-62-30-04000008
Colby DugganF212-72-52-22100008
Jlynn CounterG361-80-22-23810004
Chadlyn TraylorG272-70-10-00100004
Jaxon PruntyG161-21-10-00010003
Martin KaluG250-50-20-04310000
Campbell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jeremiah JohnsonG406-140-24-452000016
DJ SmithG373-171-134-442400011
Dovydas ButkaF375-140-20-061100010
Muneer NewtonF204-50-00-011010008
Cam GregoryG373-71-30-03140007
Tasos CookG171-30-11-21100003
Chris Fields Jr.F121-60-00-04110002

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8
102.0Offensive Efficiency93.8
93.8Defensive Efficiency102.0
8.2Net Efficiency-8.2
50.0%Effective FG%36.4%
52.7%True Shooting %40.3%
21.0%Turnover Rate11.7%
14.5%Free Throw Rate15.2%
25.5%3-Point Rate31.8%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.14
Game Summary
Charleston won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.