
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%Colgate
66.3%Boston University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBoston University -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -197

Boston University
16-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 74
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreBoston University 78
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index50.3
111.7Offensive Efficiency115.3
109.0Defensive Efficiency113.1
2.7Net Efficiency2.2
-2.0Strength of Schedule-2.7
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency11.2
68.4Tempo65.4
54.5%Effective FG%58.6%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.7%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %27.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate32.2%
1.8Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Boston University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–48.8), offensive efficiency (115.3–111.7), recent form (11.2–-0.3), shooting efficiency (58.6–54.5).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.0–113.1), net efficiency (2.7–2.2), strength of schedule (-2.0–-2.7).