
Lamar
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.0%Lamar
86.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -11.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -614

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLamar 65
Projected Total142.3
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77
Team Comparison
44.1MMH Power Index55.8
105.0Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.8Defensive Efficiency103.1
1.2Net Efficiency9.5
-3.0Strength of Schedule-1.9
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
66.6Tempo67.4
48.8%Effective FG%55.7%
18.0%Turnover Rate17.9%
35.5%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
28.5%Free Throw Rate29.6%
0.8Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–103.8), net efficiency (9.5–1.2).
Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.5–29.2).