Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

62.6%Miami (OH)

37.4%Massachusetts

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -3.5

PROJECTED TOTAL166.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -167

Massachusetts

17-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 85

Projected Total166.4

Projected ScoreMassachusetts 81

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricMassachusetts

60.7MMH Power Index51.5

123.1Offensive Efficiency110.3

103.7Defensive Efficiency106.7

19.4Net Efficiency3.6

-5.6Strength of Schedule0.9

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.2

72.8Tempo72.8

60.6%Effective FG%53.2%

14.2%Turnover Rate17.9%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.7%

40.1%Free Throw Rate37.7%

14.1Average Margin2.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–51.5), offensive efficiency (123.1–110.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–106.7), net efficiency (19.4–3.6).

Massachusetts COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.9–-5.6), offensive rebounding (33.7–26.3).

Final

Miami (OH)

86—77

Massachusetts

Miami (OH) by 9 • 70.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATMassachusetts

26-52FG29-57

50.0%FG%51.0%

10-233PT10-20

43.0%3PT%50.0%

24-33FT9-16

73.0%FT%56.0%

26Rebounds33

4Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists16

7Turnovers13

9Steals3

1Blocks1

15Fouls26

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	36	7-12	2-3	7-9	5	2	2	1	23
Luke Skaljac	G	30	6-9	1-3	3-4	2	7	1	0	16
Almar Atlason	F	22	5-10	2-3	1-1	3	1	0	0	13
Eian Elmer	G	33	2-7	1-5	6-8	4	2	2	0	11
Brant Byers	G	38	2-7	2-5	3-4	5	2	1	0	9
Trey Perry	G	10	2-3	1-1	2-2	1	1	0	0	7
Antwone Woolfolk	F	20	1-1	0-0	2-5	2	0	2	0	4
Justin Kirby	G	11	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	3

Massachusetts

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaiah Placide	G	18	6-9	5-7	2-5	0	1	0	0	19
Leonardo Bettiol	F	31	7-12	0-0	4-7	9	2	1	0	18
Danny Carbuccia	G	24	5-9	3-5	2-2	2	6	1	0	15
Marcus Banks Jr.	G	37	4-12	2-6	1-2	4	2	1	0	11
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	F	35	4-7	0-0	0-0	5	3	0	0	8
K'Jei Parker	G	19	1-3	0-1	0-0	5	2	0	0	2
Dwayne Wimbley Jr.	F	14	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Jayden Ndjigue	G	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Luka Damjanac	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.7Possessions70.7

121.6Offensive Efficiency108.9

108.9Defensive Efficiency121.6

12.7Net Efficiency-12.7

59.6%Effective FG%59.6%

63.5%True Shooting %59.6%

9.9%Turnover Rate18.4%

63.5%Free Throw Rate28.1%

44.2%3-Point Rate35.1%

2.29Assist / Turnover1.23

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 70.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.