
Southeast Missouri State
20-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.3%Southeast Missouri State
57.7%UT Martin
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -136

UT Martin
22-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSoutheast Missouri State 67
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreUT Martin 71
Team Comparison
51.6MMH Power Index49.8
105.3Offensive Efficiency103.8
99.8Defensive Efficiency94.0
5.5Net Efficiency9.8
-2.4Strength of Schedule-4.8
6.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8
70.8Tempo67.2
50.6%Effective FG%49.5%
16.6%Turnover Rate21.4%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %37.9%
39.3%Free Throw Rate37.5%
3.9Average Margin6.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Southeast Missouri State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSoutheast Missouri State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–49.8), offensive efficiency (105.3–103.8), strength of schedule (-2.4–-4.8), recent form (6.4–-0.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–99.8), net efficiency (9.8–5.5), offensive rebounding (37.9–29.6).