LSU

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.9%LSU

79.1%Texas

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL163.8

MODEL MONEYLINETexas -378

Texas

21-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLSU 77

Projected Total163.8

Projected ScoreTexas 86

Team Comparison

LSUMetricTexas

54.2MMH Power Index61.6

115.5Offensive Efficiency119.6

111.3Defensive Efficiency110.1

4.2Net Efficiency9.5

4.5Strength of Schedule5.3

-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4

70.5Tempo69.2

53.4%Effective FG%55.1%

15.6%Turnover Rate15.5%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %35.9%

41.9%Free Throw Rate44.3%

2.9Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.6–54.2), offensive efficiency (119.6–115.5), defensive efficiency (110.1–111.3), net efficiency (9.5–4.2).

Final

LSU

85—88

Texas

Texas by 3 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATTexas

32-62FG29-52

52.0%FG%56.0%

5-123PT7-13

42.0%3PT%54.0%

16-19FT23-34

84.0%FT%68.0%

27Rebounds34

7Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists9

5Turnovers8

7Steals4

4Blocks3

25Fouls14

Player Box Score

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Mackinnon	G	33	11-17	2-4	3-4	2	3	0	0	27
Marquel Sutton	F	35	6-10	1-2	8-8	5	0	2	0	21
Mike Nwoko	F	20	7-13	0-0	1-3	3	0	0	1	15
Jalen Reece	G	37	4-12	2-4	4-4	3	9	2	0	14
Robert Miller III	F	20	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	2	2	4
Pablo Tamba	F	32	1-3	0-1	0-0	5	0	1	1	2
Rashad King	G	16	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Mazi Mosley	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
PJ Carter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dailyn Swain	G	21	7-12	1-2	6-10	10	2	0	0	21
Tramon Mark	G	35	6-12	2-4	4-6	3	1	3	0	18
Jordan Pope	G	27	5-8	3-3	5-8	4	1	1	0	18
Matas Vokietaitis	C	33	6-11	0-0	5-6	10	0	0	2	17
Camden Heide	F	37	3-5	1-3	1-2	3	0	0	0	8
Simeon Wilcher	G	21	2-3	0-1	0-0	0	4	0	0	4
Chendall Weaver	G	19	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	1	2
Nic Codie	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6

123.9Offensive Efficiency128.3

128.3Defensive Efficiency123.9

-4.4Net Efficiency4.4

55.6%Effective FG%62.5%

59.8%True Shooting %64.6%

7.2%Turnover Rate11.7%

30.6%Free Throw Rate65.4%

19.4%3-Point Rate25.0%

2.60Assist / Turnover1.13

Game Summary

Texas won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.