Minnesota logo

Minnesota

15-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Minnesota
58.2%Oregon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOregon -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINEOregon -139
Oregon logo

Oregon

12-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMinnesota 69
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreOregon 72

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index48.9
109.1Offensive Efficiency106.4
107.7Defensive Efficiency110.7
1.4Net Efficiency-4.3
3.2Strength of Schedule6.0
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
63.6Tempo66.7
54.1%Effective FG%49.9%
16.5%Turnover Rate17.8%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %31.6%
36.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
0.9Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Minnesota HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
82
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMinnesota holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.5–48.9), offensive efficiency (109.1–106.4), defensive efficiency (107.7–110.7), net efficiency (1.4–-4.3).
Oregon COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.0–3.2), offensive rebounding (31.6–26.5).
Final
Minnesota logo
Minnesota
6144
Oregon logo
Oregon
Minnesota by 1759.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MinnesotaTEAM STATOregon
22-55FG20-53
40.0%FG%38.0%
9-293PT2-20
31.0%3PT%10.0%
8-10FT2-2
80.0%FT%100.0%
38Rebounds28
13Offensive Rebounds6
16Assists14
13Turnovers12
7Steals8
2Blocks3
9Fouls10

Player Box Score

Minnesota
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Isaac AsumaG366-143-100-054000015
Grayson GroveF385-92-41-284300013
Cade TysonG403-101-45-683100012
Bobby DurkinF374-113-80-052110011
Langston ReynoldsG333-80-12-24301008
Kai ShinholsterG161-30-20-03020002
Oregon
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate BittleC357-151-50-074120015
Kwame Evans Jr.F365-91-22-294110013
Dezdrick LindsayF284-70-30-03120008
Sean StewartF183-60-00-02110006
Wei LinG231-40-30-01120002
Takai SimpkinsG340-100-50-02200000
Drew CarterG200-20-20-02010000
Oleksandr KobzystyiF40-00-00-00100000
Jamari PhillipsG20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

59.9Possessions59.9
101.8Offensive Efficiency73.5
73.5Defensive Efficiency101.8
28.4Net Efficiency-28.4
48.2%Effective FG%39.6%
51.0%True Shooting %40.8%
21.8%Turnover Rate20.0%
18.2%Free Throw Rate3.8%
52.7%3-Point Rate37.7%
1.23Assist / Turnover1.17
Game Summary
Minnesota won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 59.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.