La Salle

9-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.4%La Salle

82.6%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuquesne -11.5

PROJECTED TOTAL148.5

MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -475

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLa Salle 69

Projected Total148.5

Projected ScoreDuquesne 80

Team Comparison

La SalleMetricDuquesne

41.3MMH Power Index50.7

100.8Offensive Efficiency110.6

111.3Defensive Efficiency106.2

-10.5Net Efficiency4.4

4.6Strength of Schedule0.6

-13.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

66.5Tempo70.8

46.2%Effective FG%53.4%

18.2%Turnover Rate17.7%

33.8%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

38.3%Free Throw Rate38.2%

-7.0Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duquesne HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–41.3), offensive efficiency (110.6–100.8), defensive efficiency (106.2–111.3), net efficiency (4.4–-10.5).

La Salle COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–0.6), offensive rebounding (33.8–30.6), free throw rate (38.3–38.2).

Final

La Salle

61—62

Duquesne

Duquesne by 1 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

La SalleTEAM STATDuquesne

22-55FG22-46

40.0%FG%48.0%

6-203PT3-20

30.0%3PT%15.0%

11-19FT15-22

58.0%FT%68.0%

34Rebounds31

13Offensive Rebounds5

10Assists8

18Turnovers18

9Steals9

4Blocks3

17Fouls20

Player Box Score

La Salle

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Johnson	G	34	5-7	1-1	0-0	4	5	2	0	11
Ashton Walker	G	28	3-9	1-2	2-2	1	1	2	0	9
Rob Dockery	G	24	3-6	0-1	3-5	5	2	1	0	9
Josiah Harris	F	24	4-7	0-0	0-3	6	0	0	0	8
Eric Acker	G	14	2-3	1-2	3-3	0	0	1	0	8
Truth Harris	G	25	2-10	2-8	0-0	8	2	1	0	6
Jerome Brewer Jr.	F	28	2-9	1-5	0-0	4	0	2	1	5
Edwin Daniel	F	13	1-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	2	3
Jaeden Marshall	G	7	0-2	0-1	2-4	1	0	0	0	2
Nas Hart	F	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Dixon	F	22	4-4	0-0	5-6	10	1	0	2	13
Brandon Hall	G	29	5-8	2-5	0-0	2	3	0	0	12
Alex Williams	F	18	3-6	0-3	6-6	2	0	1	0	12
Tarence Guinyard	G	35	4-11	1-5	2-5	3	2	0	0	11
Jimmie Williams	G	27	2-6	0-4	1-3	4	0	2	0	5
Jakub Necas	F	25	2-4	0-0	1-2	2	0	2	0	5
Jake DiMichele	G	19	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	1	2
Cam Crawford	G	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
John Hugley IV	F	12	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	2	0	0
Stef van Bussel	C	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3

88.0Offensive Efficiency89.5

89.5Defensive Efficiency88.0

-1.4Net Efficiency1.4

45.5%Effective FG%51.1%

47.6%True Shooting %54.9%

26.1%Turnover Rate25.9%

34.5%Free Throw Rate47.8%

36.4%3-Point Rate43.5%

0.56Assist / Turnover0.44

Game Summary

Duquesne won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.