UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.0%UAB

46.0%Temple

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -0.1

PROJECTED TOTAL150.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -117

Temple

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 75

Projected Total150.7

Projected ScoreTemple 75

Team Comparison

UABMetricTemple

56.9MMH Power Index50.9

110.5Offensive Efficiency112.2

102.9Defensive Efficiency107.4

7.6Net Efficiency4.8

0.4Strength of Schedule-2.0

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5

71.7Tempo65.9

48.8%Effective FG%51.1%

12.4%Turnover Rate13.7%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %28.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate42.3%

5.4Average Margin3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–50.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.4), net efficiency (7.6–4.8), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.0).

Temple COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.2–110.5), shooting efficiency (51.1–48.8), free throw rate (42.3–36.9).

Final

UAB

76—71

Temple

UAB by 5 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTemple

28-56FG29-65

50.0%FG%45.0%

5-163PT1-15

31.0%3PT%7.0%

15-19FT12-19

79.0%FT%63.0%

31Rebounds37

5Offensive Rebounds13

15Assists11

6Turnovers5

5Steals5

5Blocks5

18Fouls16

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Westry	G	35	8-12	2-4	6-7	3	8	1	1	24
Jacob Meyer	G	34	6-12	3-5	3-4	6	1	2	0	18
Evan Chatman	F	26	4-6	0-0	3-4	4	0	0	1	11
Quaran McPherson	G	22	4-4	0-0	2-3	3	1	1	0	10
Daniel Rivera	F	30	4-9	0-0	1-1	2	0	1	1	9
Salim London	G	27	1-4	0-1	0-0	4	3	0	2	2
Dayjaun Anderson	G	26	1-9	0-6	0-0	7	2	0	0	2

Temple

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Mason	G	37	8-13	1-3	1-1	3	2	3	1	18
Derrian Ford	G	36	7-15	0-1	3-4	5	3	1	0	17
Masiah Gilyard	G	19	4-9	0-3	2-2	6	0	0	0	10
Gavin Griffiths	G	29	4-10	0-4	1-1	5	0	1	0	9
Jamai Felt	F	17	4-5	0-0	0-3	10	0	0	3	8
Aiden Tobiason	G	34	2-9	0-3	3-6	1	3	0	0	7
Babatunde Durodola	F	23	0-2	0-0	2-2	5	3	0	1	2
Spencer Mahoney	F	3	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cam Wallace	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

115.2Offensive Efficiency107.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency115.2

7.6Net Efficiency-7.6

54.5%Effective FG%45.4%

58.4%True Shooting %48.0%

9.1%Turnover Rate7.6%

33.9%Free Throw Rate29.2%

28.6%3-Point Rate23.1%

2.50Assist / Turnover2.20

Game Summary

UAB won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.