Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

79.6%Queens University

20.4%North Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -7.1

PROJECTED TOTAL161.2

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -390

North Alabama

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 84

Projected Total161.2

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 77

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricNorth Alabama

51.7MMH Power Index34.9

118.4Offensive Efficiency104.4

117.0Defensive Efficiency116.7

1.4Net Efficiency-12.3

0.1Strength of Schedule-1.2

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3

71.4Tempo66.5

56.6%Effective FG%48.9%

14.8%Turnover Rate17.2%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.5%

37.6%Free Throw Rate39.1%

0.9Average Margin-8.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–34.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–104.4), net efficiency (1.4–-12.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.2).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (116.7–117.0), offensive rebounding (31.5–29.6), free throw rate (39.1–37.6).

Final

Queens University

85—78

North Alabama

Queens University by 7 • 67.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATNorth Alabama

26-49FG30-59

53.0%FG%51.0%

10-213PT8-18

48.0%3PT%44.0%

23-28FT10-20

82.0%FT%50.0%

27Rebounds33

4Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists10

9Turnovers10

6Steals5

5Blocks2

23Fouls21

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Yoav Berman	G	34	6-11	2-3	2-2	3	2	0	0	16
Maban Jabriel	F	21	4-6	3-4	3-4	2	0	1	1	14
Carson Schwieger	F	31	3-4	3-4	3-3	3	1	1	1	12
Jordan Watford	G	19	3-6	0-1	5-7	2	5	0	0	11
Chris Ashby	G	32	2-8	2-7	4-4	3	3	3	0	10
Nasir Mann	G	29	2-7	0-2	6-6	3	2	1	0	10
Avantae Parker	F	19	4-5	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	2	8
Gus Larson	F	13	2-2	0-0	0-2	1	2	0	1	4
Isaiah Henry	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevin de Kovachich	G	32	8-13	4-6	3-4	2	3	1	0	23
Corneilous Williams	F	37	8-12	0-0	4-5	11	1	0	2	20
Dallas Howell	F	32	5-10	3-6	1-2	4	3	1	0	14
Braylon Patton	G	26	5-11	1-3	1-6	2	2	1	0	12
Donte Bacchus	F	38	3-8	0-2	1-3	3	0	1	0	7
Cortez Graham-Howard	G	20	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
King Walker	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jamal Albritton	C	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.4Possessions67.4

126.1Offensive Efficiency115.7

115.7Defensive Efficiency126.1

10.4Net Efficiency-10.4

63.3%Effective FG%57.6%

68.2%True Shooting %56.9%

13.4%Turnover Rate14.8%

57.1%Free Throw Rate33.9%

42.9%3-Point Rate30.5%

1.67Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Queens University won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 67.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.