
Middle Tennessee
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.7%Middle Tennessee
71.3%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -7.2
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -248

Sam Houston
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 74
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreSam Houston 81
Team Comparison
52.5MMH Power Index56.1
109.6Offensive Efficiency115.5
105.7Defensive Efficiency105.5
3.9Net Efficiency10.0
0.4Strength of Schedule-2.2
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
68.8Tempo71.2
52.2%Effective FG%53.2%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.6%
31.3%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
33.2%Free Throw Rate34.8%
2.7Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–52.5), offensive efficiency (115.5–109.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–105.7), net efficiency (10.0–3.9).
Middle Tennessee COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-2.2).