
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.6%DePaul
81.4%Seton Hall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeton Hall -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL136.7
MODEL MONEYLINESeton Hall -438

Seton Hall
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 63
Projected Total136.7
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 73
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index57.1
103.7Offensive Efficiency105.8
102.7Defensive Efficiency98.3
1.0Net Efficiency7.5
2.0Strength of Schedule3.5
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6
67.7Tempo66.5
49.9%Effective FG%47.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate16.7%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %34.8%
36.8%Free Throw Rate35.7%
0.7Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Seton Hall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSeton Hall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–48.4), offensive efficiency (105.8–103.7), defensive efficiency (98.3–102.7), net efficiency (7.5–1.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.9–47.9), free throw rate (36.8–35.7).