Pepperdine

9-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

26.7%Pepperdine

73.3%Portland

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPortland -7.4

PROJECTED TOTAL154.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPortland -275

Portland

15-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePepperdine 74

Projected Total154.9

Projected ScorePortland 81

Team Comparison

PepperdineMetricPortland

38.2MMH Power Index42.7

103.2Offensive Efficiency104.8

113.6Defensive Efficiency110.6

-10.4Net Efficiency-5.8

0.7Strength of Schedule1.8

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.1

70.0Tempo71.0

48.7%Effective FG%52.0%

18.3%Turnover Rate19.3%

31.1%Offensive Rebound %28.7%

34.0%Free Throw Rate36.9%

-7.3Average Margin-4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Portland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPortland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.7–38.2), offensive efficiency (104.8–103.2), defensive efficiency (110.6–113.6), net efficiency (-5.8–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHball security (18.3–19.3), offensive rebounding (31.1–28.7).

Final

Pepperdine

95—87

Portland

Pepperdine by 8 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PepperdineTEAM STATPortland

31-62FG34-55

50.0%FG%62.0%

16-283PT8-18

57.0%3PT%44.0%

17-23FT11-18

74.0%FT%61.0%

35Rebounds22

14Offensive Rebounds4

24Assists21

9Turnovers12

9Steals7

1Blocks3

17Fouls18

Player Box Score

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aaron Clark	G	37	9-14	7-8	4-5	3	0	0	0	29
Javon Cooley	G	37	7-15	5-10	2-4	3	4	3	1	21
Styles Phipps	G	38	5-13	3-4	6-6	6	12	5	0	19
Stefan Cicic	C	29	6-9	0-1	5-8	7	0	0	0	17
Yonatan Levy	F	30	2-5	1-4	0-0	6	7	0	0	5
Pavle Stošic	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Luka Vudragovic	G	6	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Nikola Radovanovic	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
David Mager	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Portland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joel Foxwell	G	38	13-23	2-8	7-8	1	8	2	0	35
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	C	30	6-6	3-3	1-4	5	1	0	1	16
Garrett Nuckolls	G	33	5-7	0-1	1-1	3	7	2	0	11
Mikah Ballew	G	13	3-6	3-6	2-3	2	0	0	0	11
James O'Donnell	F	25	4-5	0-0	0-2	4	4	1	0	8
Dante Censori-Hercules	G	33	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	4
NaVaughn Long	G	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	1	2
Cameron Williams	F	10	0-5	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Matúš Hronský	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Sam Noland	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

136.1Offensive Efficiency124.6

124.6Defensive Efficiency136.1

11.5Net Efficiency-11.5

62.9%Effective FG%69.1%

65.1%True Shooting %68.5%

13.2%Turnover Rate16.8%

37.1%Free Throw Rate32.7%

45.2%3-Point Rate32.7%

2.67Assist / Turnover1.75

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.