
Canisius
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.6%Canisius
49.4%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRider -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL135.1
MODEL MONEYLINECanisius -102

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCanisius 68
Projected Total135.1
Projected ScoreRider 68
Team Comparison
33.9MMH Power Index29.1
97.1Offensive Efficiency96.3
108.8Defensive Efficiency115.3
-11.7Net Efficiency-19.0
-1.8Strength of Schedule-0.9
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
64.8Tempo65.9
46.8%Effective FG%43.4%
19.6%Turnover Rate17.1%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
32.4%Free Throw Rate31.5%
-7.5Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Canisius HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCanisius holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (33.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (97.1–96.3), defensive efficiency (108.8–115.3), net efficiency (-11.7–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-1.8), ball security (17.1–19.6), offensive rebounding (32.8–29.1).