
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.7%Duquesne
82.3%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL150.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -465

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 70
Projected Total150.0
Projected ScoreDayton 80
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index59.9
110.6Offensive Efficiency108.5
106.2Defensive Efficiency101.5
4.4Net Efficiency7.0
0.6Strength of Schedule5.7
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
70.8Tempo68.3
53.4%Effective FG%52.0%
17.7%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
38.2%Free Throw Rate47.6%
3.1Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.7), defensive efficiency (101.5–106.2), net efficiency (7.0–4.4), strength of schedule (5.7–0.6).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.6–108.5), shooting efficiency (53.4–52.0), offensive rebounding (30.6–26.7).