Notre Dame logo

Notre Dame

13-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%Notre Dame
64.5%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -182
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNotre Dame 72
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScorePittsburgh 76

Team Comparison

49.7MMH Power Index50.5
110.3Offensive Efficiency108.4
111.2Defensive Efficiency110.4
-0.9Net Efficiency-2.0
4.7Strength of Schedule5.5
-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
68.0Tempo65.0
53.0%Effective FG%51.4%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
34.7%Free Throw Rate31.2%
-0.6Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
65
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (110.3–108.4), net efficiency (-0.9–-2.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.4), ball security (17.0–17.3).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.5–49.7), defensive efficiency (110.4–111.2), strength of schedule (5.5–4.7).
Final
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
6873
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh by 562.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATPittsburgh
26-65FG22-49
40.0%FG%45.0%
9-383PT11-24
24.0%3PT%46.0%
7-14FT18-27
50.0%FT%67.0%
38Rebounds36
16Offensive Rebounds10
14Assists16
8Turnovers10
7Steals5
3Blocks
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Notre Dame
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cole CertaG386-182-122-321100016
Logan ImesG304-101-53-483310012
Ryder FrostF174-54-50-020000012
Sir MohammedG144-60-21-31300009
Carson TowtF323-60-01-413420007
Braeden ShrewsberryG382-152-130-04310006
Brady KoehlerF202-30-00-03002004
Garrett SundraF111-20-10-02000002
Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Roman SiulepaF347-104-64-673300022
Nojus IndrusaitisG275-84-63-452100017
Cameron CorhenF383-100-07-882000013
Omari WitherspoonG333-51-11-37500008
Barry Dunning Jr.G323-101-61-24300008
Damarco MinorG361-61-52-42110005

Advanced Game Stats

62.8Possessions62.8
108.3Offensive Efficiency116.2
116.2Defensive Efficiency108.3
-8.0Net Efficiency8.0
46.9%Effective FG%56.1%
47.5%True Shooting %59.0%
12.6%Turnover Rate16.2%
21.5%Free Throw Rate55.1%
58.5%3-Point Rate49.0%
1.75Assist / Turnover1.60
Game Summary
Pittsburgh won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 62.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.